Down the Memory Hole
Cross-posted with TomDispatch.com
The Trump administration seems intent on tossing recent history down the memory hole. Admittedly, Americans have never been known for their strong grasp of facts about their past. Still, as we struggle to keep up with the constantly shifting explanations and pronouncements of the new administration, it becomes ever harder to remember the events of yesterday, let alone last week, or last month.
The Credibility Swamp
Trump and his spokespeople routinely substitute ?alternative facts? for what a friend of mine calls consensus reality, the world that most of us recognize. Whose inaugural crowd was bigger, Barack Obama?s or Donald Trump?s? It doesn?t matter what you remember, or even what?s in the written accounts or photographic record. What matters is what the administration now says happened then. In other words, for Trump and his people, history in any normal sense simply doesn?t exist, and that?s a danger for the rest of us. Think of the Trumpian past as a website that can be constantly updated to fit the needs of the present. You may believe you still remember something that used to be there, but it?s not there now. As it becomes increasingly harder to find, can you really trust your own memory?
In recent months, revisions of that past have sometimes come so blindingly fast that the present has simply been overrun, as was true with the firing of FBI Director James Comey. First, the president ordered up some brand new supporting documents from Attorney General Jeff Sessions and his deputy, Rod Rosenstein. These were designed to underpin his line that Comey was fired on their recommendation ? for being ?unfair? to Hillary Clinton. Then, even as his surrogates were out peddling that very story, Trump told NBC?s Lester Holt that, ?regardless of [Sessions? and Rosenstein?s] recommendation, I was going to fire Comey.? And he explained why:
?And in fact when I decided to just do it I said to myself, I said, ?You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story, it?s an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should?ve won.??
Which rationale for Comey?s departure is true? Both? Neither? What is ?truth? after all?
When the need to ask such questions occurs once in a while, it?s anomalous enough that we notice. We have time to remark that someone or various people in this story ? Sessions, Rosenstein, the surrogates, Trump himself ? are mistaken or even lying. Fortunately, in the case of Comey?s firing, journalists are still reporting the lies, but what happens if the rewrites of our recent history begin to come so fast that we stop keeping up?
During the Vietnam War, President Lyndon Johnson was famously said to have a ?credibility gap.? People, including journalists, had stopped believing everything his administration said about one very important topic: the war. Trump doesn?t have a credibility gap; he?s tossed us into a credibility swamp. We?re all there together swimming in a mire of truth and lies, with the occasional firecracker thrown in just to see if we?re still paying attention.
If the age of Trump doesn?t end relatively soon, the daily effort to sort out what happened from what didn?t may eventually become too much for many of us. Memory fatigue may set in, and the whole project of keeping the past in focus shelved. In that case, we might very well start to give up the concept of citizenship altogether and decide instead to just get on with our own private uninsured, underpaid, and overworked lives.
In recent months, revisions of that past have sometimes come so blindingly fast that the present has simply been overrun…
Sometimes it?s easier to simply adjust to an ever-changing official version of reality than to keep up a constant, unrewarding struggle to remember. This was the phenomenon George Orwell described so unforgettably in his dystopian novel 1984. His hero, Winston Smith, becomes aware that the sole party that runs his country incessantly rewrites the past to its own liking and advantage. In fact, he realizes that ?the past not only changed, but changed continuously.?
Like most inhabitants of the mega-state of Oceania, it wasn?t that Smith couldn?t accept such a reality. He could. What he couldn?t shake was a nightmarish sense ?that he had never clearly understood why? the Party needed to do it. ?The immediate advantages of falsifying the past were obvious, but the ultimate motive was mysterious? to him. That ?ultimate motive,? he eventually realizes, is to so destroy people?s hold on memory that they come to believe that truth genuinely is whatever the Party says it is.
In the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable?
Does President Trump know what he?s doing? Does he know that, in a more chaotic fashion than Orwell?s ?Big Brother,? he?s grinding away at American memories, threatening to turn them into so much rubble? It?s hard to say; he appears to be incapable of either self-reflection or planning, indeed of acting in any way except on impulse. He does, however, seem to know in an intuitive way what works for him, what gets him things he wants, as he has his whole professional life. He?s called his method ?truthful hyperbole.? And regardless of what he himself understands, there are certainly people around him who do grasp all too well the usefulness of that ?ultimate motive,? of convincing the public that facts are not all that stubborn after all.
The Memory Hole
Supplying alternative facts is one way of destroying memory. Erasing real facts is another.
In Orwell?s 1984, there was a slot in the wall at the Ministry of Truth where Winston Smith worked, a memory hole, into which inconvenient documents could be fed to be consumed forever by a huge basement furnace. There are, it seems, plenty of memory holes in Washington these days.
Since January, the Trump administration has been systematically removing from federal websites inconvenient information on subjects as diverse as climate change and occupational health and safety and replacing it with anodyne messages. Take, for instance, this one, which you get when you search the Environmental Protection Agency?s website for the term ?climate change? and click on links that search turns up:
This page is being updated.
Thank you for your interest in this topic. We are currently updating our website to reflect EPA?s priorities under the leadership of President Trump and Administrator [Scott] Pruitt. If you?re looking for an archived version of this page, you can find it on the January 19 snapshot.
If you do click on the link for that January 19, 2017, ?snapshot,? you can still (for now) see what the old climate change portal of the Obama era looked like. At the top of the ?snapshot,? however, is a bright red notice announcing:
This is not the current EPA website. To navigate to the current EPA website, please go to www.epa.gov. This website is historical material reflecting the EPA website as it existed on January 19, 2017. This website is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages may not work.
The government has now entered full-scale climate change denial mode. Information of just about any sort on global warming has been or is being memory-holed in a wholesale fashion at other agency websites as well. The Guardian, for instance, reports that in the part of the Department of Energy?s site addressed to children, ?sentences that point out the harmful health consequences of burning coal and other impacts of fossil fuels have gone.? At the State Department, references to President Obama?s Climate Action Plan and a recent U.N. meeting on climate change have similarly been expunged.
However, it?s not just government pronouncements on issues like climate change that are being sanitized. Actual data is disappearing from government websites. The federal government collects vast amounts of data, much of it the results of studies it has funded. Some agencies, like the Environmental Protection Agency, are required by law to retain data they collect, but they are not required to post it. This means basic information and the results of scientific research, once available online, are now only available through a Freedom of Information Act request. Of course, you have to know that the information exists in the first place in order to request it.
One result of hiding such data is that scientists citing U.S. government web pages as sources in their own work are now finding that the references they?ve pointed to have disappeared. Arctic researcher Victoria Herrmann describes watching her citations dissolve into thin air:
At first, the distress flare of lost data came as a surge of defunct links on 21 January. The U.S. National Strategy for the Arctic, the Implementation Plan for the Strategy, and the report on our progress all gone within a matter of minutes. As I watched more and more links turned red, I frantically combed the Internet for archived versions of our country?s most important polar policies.
Herrmann was able to find some of her missing articles using the Wayback Machine, an Internet archiving project. But as Herrmann points out, ?Each defunct page is an effort by the Trump administration to deliberately undermine our ability to make good policy decisions by limiting access to scientific evidence.?
It?s not just environmental information that?s been tossed down the memory hole. Concerned about the health and safety of workers or animals? The Washington Post reports some things you won?t find any more on federal sites:
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, for instance, has dramatically scaled back on publicizing its fines against firms. And the Agriculture Department has taken offline animal-welfare enforcement records, including abuses in dog breeding operations and horse farms that alter the gait of horses through the controversial practice of ?soring? the animals? legs.
Sometimes information only hangs around for a brief moment, before sliding down the memory hole. That?s what happened to an advertisement for Trump?s Florida resort, Mar-a-Lago, which was masquerading as an entry on Share America, which the State Department calls its ?platform for sharing compelling stories and images that spark discussion and debate on important topics like democracy, freedom of expression, innovation, entrepreneurship, education, and the role of civil society.? The page appeared on the website of the U.S. embassy in London.
Someone must have realized that using the State Department to advertise the President?s private club was not a great idea. Conflict of interest? No problem. It?s down the memory hole.
[W]hat happens if the rewrites of our recent history begin to come so fast that we stop keeping up?
Nor is it just government websites that are being reworked in a distinctly Orwellian fashion. Recently, the Trump 2020 reelection campaign (yes, it already exists) quietly removed many 2016 campaign documents from its website. The Washington Post?s Avi Selk describes some of the missing press releases, among them the one that reproduced Trump?s full interview with ABC News? George Stephanopoulos in which he so infamously insulted Khizr Khan, the Gold Star father who spoke out against him at the Democratic Party convention, and his wife, Ghazala.
Similarly, links to Trump?s ?New Deal for Black America,? released a week before the 2016 election, now bring up a dreaded ?404 – Page not found? message on the Trump-Pence website. Whatever that ?deal? was, it?s evidently no longer on offer, nor is it even to remain in the historical record.
The same memory hole has also evidently devoured a December 2015 press release announcing that ?Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country?s representatives can figure out what is going on.? Fortunately, versions of that particular statement were repeated often enough in enough places that lawyers have been able to continue to use it to argue against the president?s executive orders banning the entry of people from seven (now six) majority-Muslim countries.
The Trump administration?s memory holes have swallowed up more than documents and data. People have also disappeared ? if not from the world, at least from their government positions. We still remember former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and former FBI Director James Comey, but who remembers Ponisseril Somasundaran or Courtney Flint? They are among the scientists recently dismissed from the Environmental Protection Agency?s Board of Scientific Counselors. Among their duties was to give advice on environmental regulation. They are to be replaced, according to agency spokesperson J.P. Freire, by people ?who understand the impact of regulations on the regulated community? ? that is, representatives of polluting industries.
The United States of Amnesia
Gore Vidal coined the expression ?the United States of Amnesia? in a 2004 book about George W. Bush?s America. The particular instance of amnesia Vidal highlighted with that phrase was the failure of those then waging the ?war on drugs? to remember the disasters of the prohibition of alcohol sales in the 1930s, and the ensuing corruption, gangsters, and smuggling rings that came with it.
His larger point, however, was that, in general, American historical memory is short. Thirteen years after Vidal?s book appeared, and with a new Republican administration ascendant, it seems that this country is in danger of sinking ever deeper into a state of amnesia. And can there be any question that, in a distinctly Orwellian fashion, the new administration is doing everything in its power to hasten that process? As the Trump administration prepares for a new ?surge? on the perpetual battlefield that is Afghanistan, we?ve conveniently forgotten how little the last one achieved. We?ve forgotten how deregulation led to the Great Recession, as the federal Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission concluded in 2011. ?The greatest tragedy,? that panel wrote, ?would be to accept the refrain that no one could have seen this coming and thus nothing could have been done. If we accept this notion, it will happen again.? Yet the Republicans in Congress can?t wait to repeal Dodd-Frank, the law that restored a semblance of regulation to the world of commercial banking.
The fifth-century African bishop St. Augustine was probably the first Western thinker to pay attention to human memory. In his Confessions, Augustine observes that it is memory ? the ability to bring into present awareness past experiences and the ability to recognize the difference between past, present, and future ? that makes us self-aware beings. He described the ?vast hall of my memory,? where ?I meet myself and recall what I am, what I have done, and when and where and how I was affected when I did it.? It is on the basis of memory, he added, that ?I reason about future actions and events and hopes, and again think of all these things in the present. ?I shall do this and that,? I say to myself within that vast recess of my mind which is full of many rich images, and this act or that follows.?
If Augustine was right and memory gives us ourselves, allowing us to ?reason about future actions and events and hopes,? then a political regime that seeks to destroy its people?s memory is an existential threat.
In that case, the first act of resistance is to remember who we are.
Rebecca Gordon, a TomDispatch regular, teaches in the philosophy department at the University of San Francisco. She is the author of American Nuremberg: The U.S. Officials Who Should Stand Trial for Post-9/11 War Crimes. Her previous books include Mainstreaming Torture: Ethical Approaches in the Post-9/11 United States and Letters from Nicaragua.
Follow TomDispatch on Twitter and join us on Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch Book, John Dower?s The Violent American Century: War and Terror Since World War II, as well as John Feffer?s dystopian novel Splinterlands, Nick Turse?s Next Time They?ll Come to Count the Dead, and Tom Engelhardt?s Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World.
– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.